点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
中国省级两会密集召开 班子换届 、拼经济等受关注******
(神州写真)中国省级两会密集召开 班子换届 、拼经济等受关注
中新社北京1月10日电 (记者 王欢)本周，2023年中国省级地方两会密集召开。时值换届，省级领导班子调整，以及各地如何规划新一年发展等，引人注目。
中国各级人民代表大会和人民政治协商会议被统称为“两会”。省级两会一般会先于全国两会在每年1、2月召开。2023年春节为1月22日，不少省份将两会召开日期定于节前的1月上中旬。
1月10日，上海市政协十四届一次会议开幕。 周孙榆 摄据中新社记者梳理，31个省份中至少有24个省份的两会锁定本周召开。1月10日为首波高峰，最早进入两会时间的省市包括上海、天津、广东、福建、四川、江西、河北、云南。
有多地人代会时间进行了调整，均安排在10日以后。西藏自治区人代会召开时间由原定的1月7日调整为1月13日。原定于1月5日召开的江西省人代会、1月9日召开的云南省人代会调整到1月11日召开。
今年省级两会上，各省份人大、政府、政协领导班子将完成换届，人事议题料将备受关注。
按照惯例，除北京、上海、天津、重庆、广东、西藏、新疆外，其他24省区市人大常委会主任均由省级党委书记兼任。截至1月3日，全国已有17位省级党委“一把手”调整。
政府层面，几位省级政府主官如无意外将在省级人代会上去“代”转正，如北京市代市长殷勇、陕西省代省长赵刚、山西省代省长金湘军、黑龙江省代省长梁惠玲，他们均于2022年下半年履新。
“跨省调任”近期成为中国政坛热词，多个省份陆续调整了省级政协党组书记。梳理媒体报道，吴存荣从重庆调任山西省政协党组书记；赵永清自宁夏赴贵州任省政协党组书记；曾在贵州任职的刘晓凯已任云南省政协党组书记。
此外，先后担任过北京市副市长、市委常委、市委副书记等职的张延昆转任内蒙古自治区政协党组书记；此前担任该职的李秀领转任北京市人大常委会党组书记。司法部部长唐一军任江西省政协党组书记；湖南省委原副书记朱国贤已任吉林省政协党组书记；湖北省委原副书记李荣灿已任海南省政协党组书记。
除人事外，各地如何拼经济也是关键议题。2022年中央经济工作会议明确指出，将“着力扩大国内需求”放在2023年经济工作五大重点工作任务之首，强调“要把恢复和扩大消费摆在优先位置”。各地省级两会必将密集点题拼经济、促消费，此前召开的地市级两会已提前透露出强烈信号。
北京市多个区级政府工作报告勾勒高质量发展经济的2023年路线图，释放大量投资、产业和商业机会；上海各区域聚焦互联网、生物医药、新能源汽车等“未来产业”，提出向实体经济下功夫，向创新产业要动能；广州市明确，要优化国际消费中心城市整体布局，加快推进地标性商业综合体建设；武汉市将扩大内需作为年度首要重点工作，欲“点燃大武汉消费热情”。
中国已步入对新冠病毒感染实施“乙类乙管”的疫情防控新阶段，多地口岸恢复通关、跨境旅游重新开通，省级两会如何结合各地实际统筹疫情防控和经济发展，推出地方发展新举措，外界亦拭目以待。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)